FreeNewMexican.com
Contact Us | Create an Account / Login | Site Map
Last Update
Wed May 14, 2008 12:17 pm
Subscribe | NM Jobs | Real Estate - Virtual Tours | Classifieds | Grocery Coupons | Advertise | Archives | Santa Fe Tourism | Bill Richardson File
autos.gif
careers.gif
homes.gif
SANTAFENEWMEXICAN.COM
News: Santa Fe / NM, Business


www.SantaFeNewMexican.com has moved.
Please update your bookmarks to http://www.santafenewmexican.com.
This is an archived site and will not be updated with news and information beginning Oct. 11, 2007.

Judge sides with watchdog group in LANL case
(2 comments; last comment posted September 28, 2007 12:23 pm) print | email this story
 

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 28, 2007

A federal judge has sided with a nuclear watchdog group that sued the federal government over access to site plans for Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Nuclear Watch New Mexico wanted the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration to turn over plans for the years 2003 through 2006. The Santa Fe group had requested the information under the federal Freedom of Information Act, but it took more than 17 months for the information to be released.

The group, in its complaint, accused NNSA of a “pattern and practice of unlawfully withholding agency records.”

Tracy Loughead, a spokeswoman for NNSA in Albuquerque, declined to comment Thursday.

The agency argued such plans contain important information on the direction of the federal nuclear weapons lab, and the documents had to be reviewed at several levels before they could be released, resulting in the delay.

U.S. District Judge Bruce Black ruled the agency offered no rationale for its multilayered, cross-country review process or the resulting delay. He noted the Freedom of Information Act requires agencies to respond to requests for information within 20 days, and 10-day extensions are allowed when there are unusual circumstances.

“This makes a mockery of the 20-day target set by the act and violates congressional intent,” Black wrote in an 11-page order dated Sept. 19.

The case is not over, however. Black said further hearings would be scheduled to address remedies of the FOIA violation as well as Nuclear Watch’s complaints about information that was blacked out from documents released by the agency.

Richard Mietz, an attorney for Nuclear Watch, said the ruling is a vindication of the group’s right to a timely response under the law.

Nuclear Watch executive director Jay Coghlan said his group looks forward to “real remedies that require prompt disclosure of information under citizens’ right to know.”

I want to read and/or post comments on this story
(2 comments; last comment posted September 28, 2007 12:23 pm)
Search engine optimization and website marketing provided by Trafficdeveloper
 
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use | ©2008, Santa Fe New Mexican, all rights reserved. Opinions expressed by readers do not necessarily reflect the views of the management and staff of the Santa Fe New Mexican.